John Terry may be the club’s captain, but for Chelsea fans, Frank Lampard is just as much of a talisman. He is the leading goal scorer amongst the club’s active players. Behind Terry and backup goaltender Claudio Cudicini, he is the longest tenured player at the club. Having signed in 2001, he is one of the few players whose tenure transcends the ownership of Roman Abramovich. His ascendancy to football star has coincided with Chelsea’s rise to world club football dominance. That maturation culminated in 2005 when Chelsea won the Premiership while Lampard was the runner-up to Ronaldinho for FIFA World Player of the Year.
This history makes it difficult for Chelsea supporters to realize: Lampard should probably be sold. The star midfielder has intimated that he would like to play outside the Premiership before his career is over. At 30 years old and with ardent fan Jose Mourinho coaching Inter Milan, now is the time. Lampard has one more year on a contract that he seems reticent to buy-out, but if Chelsea does not sign-off on his transfer to Italy, Lampard seems likely to leave next season for nothing.
Adding to the player’s contract situation and wishes as reasons for him to leave Stamofrd Bridge is the actual formation. A number of factors are combining to make Lampard an awkward fit for the Blues. Last season, the club had a problem moving the ball out of their own third, having to rely excessively on targeting Dider Drogba for a lack of players in the midfield who could link-up with the forwards. Playing Michael Essien at right back half the time contributed to this problem, and moving him back to the middle will be part of the solution. Another part of the solution is the acquisition of Deco, who is exactly the kind of creative presence Chelsea lacked in the middle. With the emergence of Michael Ballack as one of best players in the world granting him a place in midfield, the center of Chelsea’s lineup has become crowded, with Lampard - talented though he is - possibly being the first man out.
As we walk through the evolution of Chelsea’s formation (from what was used last season to what is most likely for the upcoming season), you will see why Chelsea could be justified in selling Lampard for on-the-field reasons.
Going back to the end of last season, Chelsea was using a 4-5-1: a V-formation from the back topped by Drogba. This functioned as a 4-1-2-2-1, with one defensive midfielder and two wings.
Chelsea’s formation, end-of-season, 2008
|
|
|
|
| Drogba |
| Malouda/Kalou |
|
|
J. Cole |
| Lampard |
Ballack |
| Makelele |
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Essien |
| Cech |
This formation is a compromise Avram Grant makes to get all of Lampard, Ballack and Essien playing while keeping a true holding midfielder on the pitch. Essien, Chelsea’s strongest physical presence in midfield, moves to right back merely because he can. An incredibly versatile athlete, Essien pays the price for his talents, being taken out of his most natural position as Grant tries to keep everybody happen. When injuries occurred or players needed breaks, Essien would move back to the middle. But when all were healthy, as they were for the Champions League final against Manchester United, Essien was a wing back.
This compromise ended up costing Chelsea in that final when Cristiano Ronaldo United’s only goal by vaulting over Essien for a header. That compromise ends this season with Grant’s departure, Luiz Felipe Scolari’s hiring, and the addition of right back Jose Bosingwa from FC Porto. Bosingwa is a favorite of Scolari’s from the Portuguese national team and gives them their best option as a true right back. Barring a departure of Ricardo Carvalho, this makes Chelsea’s back line for 2008-09 pretty clear:
Chelsea’s prospective back line, start-of-season 2008
|
|
|
|
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Bosingwa |
| Cech |
Michael Essien back to the midfield, a place where he will be needed as Chelsea tries to solve their problems in linking-up. Here, Essien’s versatility becomes a virtue, as he can play one of the holding positions Scolari is apt to employ.
Because of his ability to address Chelsea’s problem in transition, Deco is also a given, as is Drogba, who despite all his faults remains Chelsea most dangerous player.
Part of Chelsea’s prospective lineup, start-of-season 2008
|
|
|
|
| Drogba |
|
Deco |
|
| Essien |
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Bosingwa |
| Cech |
At this point Chelsea’s main problems from last season are addressed, but the midfield is getting crowded and neither Lampard or Ballack have been slotted. Now something that Chelsea fans known for the past two seasons get applied to the club’s tactics: Michael Ballack is better than Frank Lampard.
Whereas the two players could coexist in the same midfield while Jose Mourinho was there to find a ways around the problems their similarities engender, that solution is no longer available. They are both very talented, resourceful players whose soccer acumen will always find ways to get a club goals. But having two plays with that profile playing in the middle of the field means you need to have others who can carry the ball out of your own end and into attack. The solution to that problem previously employed at Chelsea - mainly, Mourinho getting super-human play out of Drogba and others - can no longer be relied upon. Drogba may never be the force that he was two seasons ago, whether by lack of will or by lack of health. Chelsea needs to play their best players with the ball (Deco and Essien) in the middle, meaning there’s only one more slot left in the center of the pitch lest the Blues overcrowd the middle.
In addition to having a case for that spot based on ability and performance, Michael Ballack is a better fit for what Scolari is likely to do. Scolarli likes playing two deep midfielders, a role Ballack is more suited for than Lampard. True, Ballack is not a traditional holding midfielder; in fact, to limit him to such a role be a waste of his talents. But though it’s been said that Scolari likes two traditional holding midfielders, his use of the Joao Moutinho in Euro 2008 along side the more defensive Petit as his deep pair in Portugal’s midfield speaks to a willingness to transcend the customary profile of a defensive midfielder.
At times, Michael Ballack played deep for Joachim Low and Germany in Euro 2008 along side Torsten Frings and Simon Rolfes when the team played a 4-4-2 (Germany switched out of this formation half-way through the tournament). Low allowed Ballack the freedom to move into the play at will, a freedom it should not be assumed Scolari would withhold.
Chelsea’s prospective lineup without wings, start-of-season 2008
|
|
|
|
| Drogba |
|
Deco |
|
| Ballack |
Essien |
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Bosingwa |
| Cech |
At this point, there are a couple of options, should Chelsea keep Lampard. Scolari could ask him to play one of the wing positions that would otherwise be occupied by Salomon Kalou and Joe Cole in a 4-5-1. Lampard could also be asked to play in support of Didier Drogba, essential moving to a forward position in a 4-4-2. The second would set off a series of balance issues (Deco’s most effective place is in the middle of the pitch), making a wing role more likely.
A player as talented as Lampard should be able to adapt to either wing spot, and it is exciting to think of what a midfield, attacking partnership between he and Deco could go. With either Ballack or Essien on their side, it would be as talented a midfield triangle that could reasonably be assembled. But would Lampard be happy in a role that saw him moved from the middle of the pitch? If he is willing to try, Scolari could open the season with the most dangerous lineup in the league.
Chelsea’s prospective lineup, start-of-season 2008
|
|
|
|
| Drogba |
| Lampard |
Deco |
J.Cole |
| Ballack |
Essien |
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Bosingwa |
| Cech |
If you accept this picture of Chelsea, it sheds new light on the question of whether Lampard should stay. On the left wing, is it worth keeping him, though he is still likely to move at the end of the season? Or should the Blues cash in now while they may still be able to extract a £8 to £10 million transfer fee from Inter Milan?
One compromise may be to wait until January, when the winter transfer window would allow another chance to sell Lampard. Six months before the end of his contract, it is doubtful Inter Milan would pay as much in a transfer. They may not be willing to give anything at all. Mourinho is very confident Lampard will join Inter in July 2009. Six more months would be little to wait. But waiting would not only give Scolari and Chelsea a chance to assess whether their newly configured midfield can work, it would also give the club a chance to convince Lampard he has a future on the left wing.
If Chelsea and Lampard do come to an agreement on a contract, it will likely be for one of the highest salaries in the world. This is not the type of salary a club should be pay to a player they will have to play out-of-position. Even in this best-case scenario (where Lampard likes to play and is successful on the left wing) he will still have to be paid like a dominant, middle-of-the-pitch player. And that’s if he takes to left wing.
While it’s sad to see situations develop where a club’s talisman would benefit by moving, Chelsea’s roster and Frank Lampard’s plans match-up in this respect: It would be better if he moved now.
Chelsea’s prospective lineup without Lampard, start-of-season 2008
|
|
|
|
| Drogba |
| Kalou |
Deco |
J.Cole |
| Ballack |
Essien |
| A. Cole |
Terry |
Carvalho |
Bosingwa |
| Cech |
If you have any questions or comments about the article, you can contact the author here or leave your comment, below.